Subject	Not to mention no correction for wind resistance. (n/m)
Posted by	Chip(GMS Racing) on August 14, 2004 at 12:24 PM
	This message has been viewed 223 times.
In Reply To	Addendum 1: Inertial Dynos -versus- Brake Dynos posted by ni[X]it on August 12, 2004 at 10:45 AM
Message
Follow Ups	The "Dyno-Dissertation": Things you might want to know... - Ash's Z (In Progress) 07:09:26 08/12/04 move to tech so we can VTF (n/m) - jpark(Md) 07:25:16 08/12/04 What a gift! Thanks Ash. (n/m) - slowjohn 07:29:29 08/12/04 excellant read ..its a shame I'm at work right now ! (n/m) - Slowninja(Sport600 Inconel Z) 07:45:14 08/12/04 Thank you (n/m) - neurozurgeon 08:25:18 08/12/04 Wow... (n/m) - craziestbob 08:29:31 08/12/04 Addendum 1: Inertial Dynos -versus- Brake Dynos - ni[X]it 10:45:21 08/12/04 Question: why can't you tune part-throttle on a drum dyno? - Technomancer 12:22:56 08/12/04 because the intertail dyno is providing very little load - ni[X]it 19:01:03 08/12/04 Not to mention no correction for wind resistance. (n/m) - Chip(GMS Racing) 12:24:48 08/14/04 FYI, took me 30 pages to print this out. oh my. (n/m) - ni[X]it 10:49:59 08/12/04 28 for me. my eyes started to hurt reading online (n/m) - dogpile 17:01:01 08/12/04 nice (n/m) - GodZilla(noVA) 11:07:14 08/12/04 I've sent you a few emails can you PLEASE respond! (n/m) - TTZen 12:44:57 08/12/04 Nice...thanks! (n/m) - cainmt (Toledo,OH) 16:27:59 08/12/04 bravo! - Jimiz91 07:18:52 08/13/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.